Microsoft Doesn’t Innovate
With Google coming on strong, everyone keeps poking at Microsoft, saying that they are behind the times. I’ve heard many times that Microsoft missed the boat on capitalizing on Web technologies and let Google take the lead. Oh how Microsoft’s day are numbered! I say, not so fast.
Microsoft is not an innovator, they never have been, they never will be. They are terrible at being a first mover (remember Microsoft Bob?); they succeed only in areas where others have already succeeded. Let’s take a trip down memory lane to see the trend:
Windows – You know the story, Microsoft got an early look at the Macintosh user interface and next thing you know, there was Windows.
Internet Explorer – Another one you probably know. Netscape was way ahead in this race when Microsoft decided to jump in and dominate the market. Netscape went under.
Pocket PC – Once again, Microsoft entered a mature market, this one dominated by Palm. Now, Pocket PCs rule the market and Palm is in danger of going out of business.
Windows Media Player – Now we’re looking at both Quicktime and RealPlayer. Microsoft didn’t put them out of business, but RealPlayer is struggling to keep a foothold in the streaming media business.
So is Microsoft behind the times? Yes they are, but they always have been and they always have risen to the occassion. They actually take a very smart approach, however inadvertently: wait for a market to develop, evaluate what is being done wrong in it, and then do it better. It’s a proven strategy, so don’t hand the crown of the Web over to Google just yet. They, too, may fall behind the power of a fast-moving Microsoft.
Disclaimer: Any viewpoints and opinions expressed in this article are those of Nicholas C. Zakas and do not, in any way, reflect those of my employer, my colleagues, Wrox Publishing, O'Reilly Publishing, or anyone else. I speak only for myself, not for them.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.




5 Comments
I don't know if to post this comment here or below 'Microsoft invented AJAX'…
They waited for the name AJAX to be well-known and then refactor it with the name ATLAS.
Emilio on November 4th, 2005 at 6:09 am
In Grad school, they called the Microsoft strategy, depending on the product, either "Fast Follower" or "Last in, Best Dressed."
In some cases, they've been behind the leader, but not by that much. Just enough to let them make the mistakes so that MSFT didn't have to make them. WMP is a good example of LIBD, they came very late to the market, but their offering, combined with their clout, made it so that they had a viable product immediately, and stole significant market share.
FireFoxMan on November 4th, 2005 at 9:29 am
I've been saying this about MS for years now. They may not innovate, but they'll take pre-existing ideas and make them better. Solid business plan, if you ask me. MS' "innovation" have been awful at best.
Stick with what you know, and you'll do well. MS is proof of that.
Jeremy on November 4th, 2005 at 9:45 am
The only reason they can afford to use this approach is that they have the money to sit back and pounce when they want. That's the big difference between Microsoft and the rest: they have the cash!
Fred Sanford on November 7th, 2005 at 8:20 am
I would think twice when it comes to Google. I think Microsoft may bite more then it can chew if it tries to contend with Google. If you haven't noticed Google is a monster. Those other companies were no where in the same band as Google and If MS thinks that oh yeah this will be easy, think again. You should also remember that Google is not by itself it has alias which have similar interest, MS.
Luis Tello on November 14th, 2005 at 2:39 pm
Comments are automatically closed after 14 days.